Say yes to more agents, because every one is governed.
Teams across the company are deploying agents that call internal APIs, hit third-party tools, and spend money. GateCore is the single control point that decides what they may do, prices what they cost, and records what they did.
Four situations.
- Security calls it shadow AI: agents in production with shared keys nobody can revoke granularly.
- Finance sees a rising, unpredictable agent bill with no per-team, per-agent breakdown.
- Audit asks who approved this agent to touch that system, and nobody can answer.
- The internal governance build is two quarters in and covers one use case.
The control plane, not another gateway.
API gateways route traffic. This governs the action itself.
Every action allowed before it runs
Signed requests pass identity, trust, policy, and pricing gates, fail-closed. If a decision service is unreachable, nothing executes.
Priced and reserved before execution
Every action carries a price and reserves funds first. Finance gets a per-agent, per-team breakdown instead of a surprise invoice.
An append-only record that answers the question
Request, decision, rule, approver, execution, cost: one tamper-evident chain, exportable for internal audit and customer questionnaires.
Each product, mapped to the job it does here.
Only the use cases that genuinely apply in this industry are listed.
Every agent action through one checkpoint
Identity, policy, trust, and pricing gates on every action, fail-closed, with a human review queue for the consequential ones and an exportable audit for the rest.
Gateway checkpoint · policy + review queue · governed data sharing · receipts
When the enterprise is also a seller
The same gate makes your own data and services sellable to governed buyers: listed with machine-readable terms, trust-gated, metered, and settled with signed receipts.
Marketplace listing · verified lead delivery · settlement + signed receipts
Six gates, in order, on every request.
If any gate fails, nothing is delivered and nothing is billed.
A policy edit is a rule change, not a redeployment, and every change is attributed.
Build it, or point at it.
The common alternative is an internal governance build. Compare the arithmetic honestly, with your own numbers.
Illustrative comparison with placeholder inputs, not a quote or a promised saving. Your build scope, loaded costs, and tier will differ; the published ladder is on the pricing page and enterprise volume is negotiated down from it.
Same gate, sized to you.
The published schedule, no asterisks.
Published rates are ceilings: volume pricing is negotiated down, never up.
Marketplace procurement of third-party capabilities, when you use it, follows the published settlement schedule.
Shipped, and where the path runs next.
Reviewers get this split up front, because finding it later kills a deal.
Available today
- Fail-closed governed execution with per-agent cryptographic identity
- Ordered, attributed policy with a human review queue and escrowed holds
- Pre-execution pricing, reservation, and per-agent cost attribution
- Append-only, hash-chained audit with third-party-verifiable receipts
- Hosted infrastructure: nothing installs in your environment
- Governed marketplace procurement of third-party capabilities
Not claimed today
- No compliance certifications are claimed on this page; our security model is published and we answer questionnaires directly.
- Private and on-premises deployment is scoped per engagement, not an off-the-shelf SKU.
- External payment rails for marketplace settlement are roadmap.
The two that come up first.
Is this just another API gateway?
A new vendor on the critical path is a risk. Why take it?
Route your scariest agent through the gate first.
Tell us the agent your security team worries about most.
Request access